‘One third of baby rice has arsenic’ (Telegraph, 29 Apr 2008)

By Auslan Cramb, Scottish Correspondent

One third of baby rice on sale in British supermarkets contains an unsafe level of arsenic, say researchers.

It means some children could be getting six times the amount of inorganic arsenic that they should be receiving for their weight and height because the rice is also found in other common foods.

Researchers from Aberdeen University also found high levels of arsenic, which has been found to cause an increased risk of some cancers, in other rice foods, including rice milk and puffed rice cereals.

Prof Andrew Meharg and colleagues tested 17 samples from three unnamed brands of baby rice bought in British supermarkets. He said it was time to re-examine the safe levels of arsenic in food.

“I don’t want to give out nutritional advice to the public, but as a parent I would try to reduce my baby’s exposure to any contamination,” he said.

A spokesman for the Food Standards Agency said although the current evidence suggested that there was no cause for concern, further research was being conducted into arsenic levels in rice and rice products.

She said: “We will be monitoring the situation and looking at data as it emerges. We also intend to raise the subject with the European Commission.

“The FSA has conducted a number of surveys of arsenic in weaning foods and formulae. These show that the low intakes of arsenic from infant foods have not increased, indicating that they are as low as reasonably practicable. The measured levels do not raise concerns for the health of infants.”

The existing standard was set in 1959 before arsenic was recognised as a carcinogen, and does not apply to inorganic arsenic, the most toxic form of the chemical element. While there are strict regulations on the amount of inorganic arsenic in water, the danger posed by rice and rice products has been largely ignored.

Previous studies have shown that ingestion of inorganic arsenic can increase the risk of skin, liver, bladder and lung cancer, and there is some evidence that long-term exposure in children may result in low IQ scores.

Prof Meharg said: “We are talking about a carcinogen that could be reduced in baby foods. Thirty-five per cent of the baby food we analysed had levels of inorganic arsenic that would make them illegal in China. Our regulations are totally outdated and need to be re-visited.”

Arsenic is a metallic element that forms a number of poisonous compounds in nature known as inorganic arsenic. Prof Meharg said much cotton production relied on pesticides containing inorganic arsenic that were still being picked up by rice in some parts of the world.

Based on the European Union limits for arsenic in drinking water, babies could be receiving six times the recommended dose. The levels found ranged from 0.06mg of arsenic per kg of rice to 0.16. In China, which sets the most stringent standard, anything above 0.15mg/kg is illegal, which would rule out 35 per cent of the samples tested.

The results were reported in the journal Environmental Pollution.

Arsenic and toxic metals found in baby foods (Telegraph, 09 Apr 2011)

By Richard Gray, Science Correspondent and Alastair Jamieson

Baby foods used to wean infants off milk have been found to contain “alarming” levels of toxic contaminants including arsenic, lead and cadmium.

Last night there were calls for urgent new safety rules to control the presence of the poisons in foods intended for young children.

The findings come as officials at the Food Standards Agency and the European Commission are conducting an urgent review to establish new limits for the long term exposure of these contaminants in food.

The products tested by the researchers were made by major baby food manufacturers including Organix, Hipp, Nestle and Holle – some of which are available in British supermarkets.

Researchers found feeding infants twice a day on the shop-bought baby foods such as rice porridge can increase their exposure to arsenic by up to fifty times when compared to breast feeding alone.

Exposure to other toxic metals such as cadmium, which is known to cause neurological and kidney damage, increased by up to 150 times in some of the foods tested by Swedish scientists, while lead increased by up to eight times.

Although none of the levels of the toxic elements found in the foods exceeded official safety limits, scientists believe they are still of concern if fed to very young children and have demanded new guidelines to restrict their presence in food.

Young infants are thought to be particularly vulnerable to these substances because they are going through rapid development.

Writing in the journal of Food Chemistry, the scientists from the Unit of Metals and Health at Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden, where the research was carried out, said: “Alarmingly, these complementary foods may also introduce high amounts of toxic elements such as arsenic, cadmium, lead and uranium, mainly from their raw materials.

“These elements have to be kept at an absolute minimum in food products intended for infant consumption.

“In infant foods, the high concentrations of arsenic in the rice-based foods are of particular concern.”

Experts now believe there are no safe limits for arsenic and manufacturers should be making more efforts to remove it from their food.

Professor Andrew Meharg, a biogeochemist at Aberdeen University who has studied the presence of arsenic in rice, said the latest research highlighted the urgent need for new restrictions on arsenic and other toxic elements in food.

He said: “For an adult with an average consumption of rice every day, it makes little difference, but for young babies who are the most vulnerable receptors we should be doing everything we can to reduce that risk. You don’t want DNA damage during infant development.

“There are ways to decrease the toxic load in food. It is only recently that we have started using rice in baby foods and formulas. You can reduce the arsenic in infant foods very rapidly by sourcing the rice from different parts of the world. You can reduce it by four or five fold by carefully selecting the right rice.”

The researchers tested nine different brands of baby food, which were intended to be fed to children from the age of four months old, and nine baby milk formulas.

They found that when compared to breast milk, the baby foods had elevated levels of toxic contaminants measured in micrograms – a millionth of a gram, or 35 billionths of an ounce.

The daily safe intake limit for arsenic was set by the World Health Organisation as two micrograms for every kilogram of body weight, but this was suspended earlier this year amid growing evidence that arsenic can cause cancer even at low levels.

The limits for lead have also been suspended while those for cadmium are one microgram for every kilogram of body weight.

Arsenic and the other heavy metals found in the study are often found in food as they are absorbed from the soil by plants such as rice, wheat and oats.

Among the baby foods found to contain elevated levels of arsenic, cadmium and lead in the tests by the researchers was Organix First Organic Whole Grain Baby Rice, which they found contained two micrograms of arsenic per portion, along with 0.03 micrograms of cadmium and 0.09 micrograms of lead. This product is sold by Boots in the UK.

HiPP Organic Peach and Banana Breakfast porridge, which is sold by supermarkets in the UK including Tesco, contained 1.7 micrograms of arsenic, 0.13 micrograms of cadmium and 0.33 micrograms of lead.

Holle Organic Rice Porridge, which is sold by specialist retailers, was found to contain 7.3 micrograms of arsenic per portion – the highest found in the study – along with 0.38 micrograms of cadmium and 0.26 micrograms of lead.

The Swedish National Food Administration is now conducting its own review of toxic elements and metals in baby food and food for older children as a result of the research. The results will be reported to the European Food Safety Authority and the European Commission, which is responsible for setting food safety limits.

The Sunday Telegraph contacted each of the major manufacturers of leading brands of baby food sold in the UK but most refused to reveal the levels of toxic contaminants found in their products. Heinz, Cow & Gate, Nestle, and HiPP all insisted their foods contained levels that were within safety limits.

Dr Karin Ljung, who led the Swedish research, said: “The producers will say they are not above any guideline values and it is true – they are following all the rules.

“The trouble is that the guidelines are not based on infant exposure. As we are getting more information coming out, it is may be time to reconsider what these safety limits are.”

She added that breast feeding until babies were six months old appeared to be the best way to keep infants’ exposure to these toxic contaminants as low as possible as they seemed to be filtered out by the mothers’ body.

There are currently no EU-wide regulations for arsenic levels in food after the European Food Safety Authority ruled that previous safety limits were inadequate.

Jackie Schneider, from the Children’s Food Campaign, said: “We expect full transparency from baby food manufacturers and are disappointed that they are choosing to not share the relevant data.

“Parents aren’t stupid and they deserve to be given the facts so they can make an informed choice”

A spokesman for the Food Standards Agency said previous reviews of the levels of toxic elements in baby food found them to be present at low levels.

He added: “The Agency is actively engaging with the European Commission to review and establish long term limits for these environmental contaminants in food.”

A spokesman for the British Specialist Nutrition Association, the trade body for baby food producers in the UK, said: “BSNA members carefully select and control their ingredients as well as the baby food, to ensure they are safe for infants.

“That selection of suitable ingredients ensures the lowest possible occurrence of certain naturally-occurring substances. Ingredients that do not meet stringent specifications are not used in baby foods.”

A spokesman for HiPP insisted the levels of arsenic and cadmium in their Organic Peach and Banana Breakfast porridge were under the official daily intake limits and so were safe as part of a daily diet.

She said: “The levels of cadmium and arsenic in HiPP products are safe and all raw materials are routinely tested following the strictest quality criteria.”

A spokesman for Organix said: “Organix operates rigorous finished food testing to ensure food safety is monitored regularly. This includes testing for elements, microbiological, allergen and pesticide residues.

“Our further testing of finished foods and raw materials show ALL results conform to the current UK food standard. We continue to monitor both our own internal results together with those of our suppliers.

“Please rest assured that we fully assess both the Food Standards Agency’s guidelines and any new research and will continue to do so.”

A spokesman for Plum added: “Sampling of our recipe shows levels for arsenic are well below those in this latest study, and again these are well within the generally regarded safe and acceptable limits.”

Nestle said it did not recommend the use of it infant cereals before six months of age, but they carefully selected their raw materials to ensure substances absorbed from the soil were as low as possible.


Toxic elements in baby food: questions and answers (Telegraph, 10 Apr 2011)

How do these contaminants get into the foods?

Arsenic, cadmium and lead are found in low levels in soil. In some places they occur naturally, in others it is due to human pollution. Food plants can absorb these elements from the soil as they grow. Rice is particularly prone to absorbing arsenic and can accumulate relatively high concentrations that have sparked concern among food safety officials.

What are the risks?

In high concentrations arsenic is known to be highly toxic, but recent research has shown that even at low levels it can cause cancer and brain damage. There is also emerging evidence that it can impact on infant development. Cadmium is known to be toxic to the kidneys where it can accumulate over time. It can also cause brittle bones and there is emerging data linking the element to increased risk of lung, bladder and breast cancers. Health officials have also raised concerns about the exposure of infants and children to lead, even at low levels, due to its effect on brain development.

What are the regulations?

The European Commission, using advise from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), has set regulations on safe limits for many toxic metals and contaminants in food. For arsenic the safe daily exposure was set at two micrograms per kilogram of body weight. EFSA, however, recently issued a new risk assessment that recommended this be reduced. It also warned that children under three years old are typically exposed to up to three times as much inorganic arsenic – the more toxic form of the element – relative to their bodyweight, compared to adults. The World Health Organisation has also suspended its own advice on arsenic in food as growing evidence suggests that even low levels can be carcinogenic. The Food Standards Agency in the UK is now working with the European Commission to set new safety limits on long-term exposure risks. Cadmium exposure is limited to 2.5 micrograms per kilogram of body weight per week in European Commission regulations. EFSA also recently ruled that its weekly exposure limit of 25 micrograms of lead per kilogram of body weight was no longer appropriate.

Should parents worry?

The levels of these contaminants found in the baby foods tested were low and within the current official safety limits set out by the European Commission. Scientists warn, however, that the risk to babies cannot be accurately estimated and it is best to be cautious. They recommend not feeding children rice-based foods until they are older than six months, and say that breast feeding up until that age can help to protect infants from elevated exposure.